I will not forget that, on the metro this Saturday morning, November 5 at 8 a.m., I told myself that this time I was going to the Palais des Congrès, that this time it would happen, that this time all this work, these articles, these meetings, these interviews, all this light brought, would not have been in vain Palais des .
I will not Palais des forget Philippe de Georges
commentary on the famous Freudian dream One is ask to close one’s eyes where the gaze is the presence of the Other who judges. Is it a question of closing one’s eyes to the fault of the grieving son or the dead father? If Freud will phone number list sh light on the Oipal fault with regard to the father, he will turn a blind eye more to the fault of the father to put him back on his pestal as father of the Horde.
In this regard, I will not forget that Serge Toubiana, in his book Les fantômes du souvenir, was able to say in a touching (and touching…) way how his father, despite his ocular precision, had not been able to see that his son was following former tory spad salma shah and broadcaster in his footsteps by repairing, like him, objects that no longer work. A father who nevertheless took him very (too?) young to see Fellini’s La Strada for an experience that later became destiny: “If they had taken me to see Bambi , my life would have been completely different.”
Gérard Wajcman, whose dialogue with him outlin a fascinating quarrel between ancients and moderns about absolute visibility in the 21st century, conclud: “Cinema is for everyone an experience with clos eyes.”
This recurrence gives in my opinion
another perspective for thinking about the consequences of this sentence from Lacan: “The first said decrees, legislates, aphorizes, is an oracle,
There is therefore, beyond the Freudian articulation to the function of the voice, an acquaintance to be defin of the superego with the gaze, as Marie-Hélène Brousse said. Let us recall that Lacan not the two objects that made Kant be numbers admire: the starry sky above our heads and the voice of the law within.
I will not forget that the AEs touch me with their simplicity, the ever-increasing evidence of a speech which makes their testimonies a rare moment and which shows the way with regard to this particular difficulty not by Lacan of tearing the (obsessive) subject from the grip of the gaze .