Asking questions to an expert is an art. An incorrectly formulated question can Asking Questions put the court in a dead end or! worse! play into the opponent’s favor. For example! in a case about determining the order of use of the house’s adjacent territory! it turn out that the land had actually already been divided between the co-owners. My client insisted on preserving the existing order. I managed to include the following in the list of questions for the expert: “Does the existing order comply with current regulations?” The expert’s answer was positive! and this became the basis for the court’s decision to approve the actual division.
In foreign practice the emphasis on questioning is also key
For example! in property valuation cases in the US! experts are requir to paytm data answer questions about the market value! replacement value! and salvage value of the property. Such a detailed breakdown allows the Asking Questions parties to have a clear idea of the economic consequences of the decision.
The evidentiary value of an expert opinion: pitfalls and ways to avoid them
Did you know that an expert opinion can be called into question even due to minor formal flaws? In one of the cases! which involv debt collection based on a receipt! the defendant submitted a handwriting expert opinion! avoid using an sla for each customer which confirm that the signature on the document was not made by him. However! this opinion was made on the basis of a copy! not the original! and it did not indicate that the document was being prepared for the court. On this basis! we obtained the appointment of an additional expert opinion.
A new commission of experts
Working with the original and appropriate samples! confirm the authenticity of the signature. Conclusion: always carefully check compliance with the procedural requirements for an expert opinion.
The UK has strict standards for expert evidence. Under the Civil Procedure Rules! an azb directory expert must be independent and objective and must support their findings with reasonable evidence. Failure to do so may result in the expert’s report being reject as unreliable.