The article examines the key role of criticality, attention to detail, and the correct Secrets of working formulation of questions to an expert in resolving complex legal cases.
The trial of a significant number of civil cases inevitably intersects with
The intricacies of conducting various expert examinations. This is mom data natural: modern disputes often require deep knowledge in areas that go far beyond the law. However, are we, lawyers, always ready to Secrets of working meet this challenge? Do we study expert opinions critically enough? Are we persistent enough to ask the right questions to the expert? This is my reflection today.
Experts. These people, with their diplomas, seals, and persuasive tone, can turn any case inside out. That’s probably why, about ten years ago, I treated their conclusions for a long time as something sacred. As if they how to combine contact management with analytics data were the last pages of the Bible. But over the years, you realize that even the most carefully thought-out examination can find a weak spot.
I remember a case where everything seemed clear
The client wanted to declare the lease agreement for a land plot invalid. The expert had to answer only one simple question: were the boundaries of the plot determined correctly? His answer was categorical: the boundaries coincide with the cadastral map. But something in this conclusion alarmed me.
I suspected that the expert had not even visited the site. In the end, I asked azb directory this directly in court, and the answer was shocking: the boundaries were “checked” only on the basis of electronic data. The court ordered a re-examination, which finally revealed that the plot also covered part of the neighboring territory. And here I felt that I had won not only for the client, but also for justice.