Supreme Court: Securing a claim by imposing an arrest on the property of a bank in Securing a claim liquidation! even if the transaction is clearly invalid! is not allowed
On February 20! 2024! the Supreme Court! as part of the panel of judges of the Cassation Economic Court! in case No. 911/880/23 (EDRSRU No. 117105830)! investigated the issue of preventing the claim from being secured by imposing Securing a claim an arrest on the property of a bank being liquidated in accordance with the Law of Ukraine “On the Deposit Guarantee System of Individuals”.
The essence of the case
Despite the fact that! firstly! the disputed land plots belong to the lands linkedin data of the water fund and their being in the possession of the bank is illegal! because such land plots could not leave the possession of the State! and secondly! they are put up for sale on the online advertising platform Prozorro-sale – taking measures to secure the claim for their preservation is inadmissible – the Supreme Court.
The situation is simply leveling out. Why the cost of renting housing in the importance of communication in the industry Kyiv has stopped growing Arsen Zhumadilov on the unification of defense procurement! criticism from the Central Procurement Committee and the UAV market.
In accordance with Article 136 of the Code of Civil Procedure of Ukraine
the commercial court! upon the application of a party to the case! has the right to take measures to secure the claim provided for in Article 137 of this Code.
Securing a claim is permitted both before filing a claim and at any stage of the burkina faso business directory case! if failure to take such measures may significantly complicate or make impossible the execution of the court decision or the effective protection or restoration of the violated or disputed rights or interests of the plaintiff! for the protection of which he has applied or intends to apply to the court! as well as on other grounds specified by law.